Should a 14-year-old married woman who migrates to European countries be considered as a kid – or even a spouse?
The problem has placed European governments in a spin: forcing an insurance policy U-turn in Denmark, new legislation within the Netherlands and an agonised debate in Germany.
Analysts state very very early wedding can be carried out in refugee camps in Lebanon, Jordan and Turkey by families wanting to protect girls from poverty or intimate exploitation. Somewhere else, bad families might marry down their young daughters in return for dowries.
The question is certainly one of liberties and protections – but which? When authorities stop minors cohabiting using their older partners, will they be child that is combating or splitting up (frequently currently traumatised) families?
Dependent on where you get in European countries, you will discover a radically various number of reactions towards the problem.
Denmark’s reaction has swung first a good way after which one other.
In Integration Minister Inger Stojberg vowed to act after a review found dozens of cases of girls living with older men in asylum seekers’ accommodation – which the minister called “totally unacceptable” february.
Couples would need “exceptional reasons” to call home together underneath the chronilogical age of 18 (the appropriate age for wedding in Denmark) with no cohabitation could be permitted whatsoever if one celebration had been below 15.
But separation apparently prompted two migrants under 18 to try committing committing committing suicide.